SuperMarioBrosS

Reviews Favorites News Main
SuperMarioBrosS

Age/Gender: 15, Male
Location: In the air from FL to PA
Job: Eating reviews

I hunger on abusive reviews. If you find abusive reviews anywhere on the site (even if it's on your own submission), let me know and I'll flag it. I constantly check the portal and eat abusive reviews. Got review questions? PM me and I'll answer it fully.

Newgrounds Stats

Sign-Up Date:
10/24/08

Level: 17
Aura: Dark

Rank: Sergeant
Blams: 505
Saves: 4,605
Rank #: 1,120

Exp. Points: 3,170 / 3,210
Exp. Rank #: 8,127
Voting Pow.: 5.94 votes

BBS Posts: 669 (1.68 per day)
Flash Reviews: 81
Music Reviews: 22
Trophies: 0
Stickers: 0

Entry #30

Jump to Entry: [ 11529 | 30 | 316011,171 ]


SuperMarioBrosS

Cleaning up NG and Whistle Points Part 10: Flagging Abusive Audio Reviews

Posted by SuperMarioBrosS Jun. 13, 2009 @ 3:58 PM EDT

Follow the guidelines and such listed in Part 2.

Despite it intentionally being the abusive AUDIO post, I decided to make this a secondary part of Part 2.

164941_Flagging_Reviews__P.jpg

Updated: 11/10/09 9:23 PM Log in to comment! | Share this!

The People Have Spoken

217 Comments

Jun. 13, 2009 | 4:57 PM Chdonga says:

You guys really missed a goldmine, one time this guy spammed EVERY new audio submission with "This is stolen, I hope you get a virus!" I can't link anyway as he got an account delete, ironically all of his flash and audio were stolen straight from the Flash Portal/Audio Portal. He made shitty excuses too, like "There was a typo, this wasn't made in '01, it was made in '08." He even tried to steal and resubmit Pico's School!

Jun. 13, 2009 | 5:10 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

If an account is made solely for the purpose of making abusive reviews, all of their reviews will be deleted and NO points will be awarded for those review deletions.

Wow, that guy is a HUGE asshole. If you see him recreating an account and posting more shit like that, post the account URL here.

There is this one spammer that got his account deleted. Then he made a new one. It's possible that that specific douchebag causing the mess would create a new account to cause more trouble. If he does, let me know. I don't exactly go to the Audio Portal that much but with this news post, I'll start to go in there more frequently.


Jun. 17, 2009 | 3:08 AM Mike-Hedgedog says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/liste n/217298
n00bzXD
Must go lurk moar!

Jun. 20, 2009 | 10:18 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Seems like the review has been taken care of.

And sorry for the late response.


Oct. 10, 2009 | 11:57 PM jakenator85 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/514109
ANIMEstarved(0) RiverStyx(0) Kvarra(1) Alex2542(0) 722890(0) majorjester001(0)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/514108/2
dudegiga(9)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/514111
cronotic(0) yanisin(0) SMW8765(1)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/514096
data662(0) drcaden(0)

Oct. 11, 2009 | 8:36 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All those links have spaces on them...


Oct. 10, 2009 | 11:57 PM jakenator85 says:

-_- Why does NG space the sentences randomly!?!?
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/514109
ANIMEstarved(0) RiverStyx(0) Kvarra(1) Alex2542(0) 722890(0) majorjester001(0)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/514108/2
dudegiga(9)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/514111
cronotic(0) yanisin(0) SMW8765(1)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/514096
data662(0) drcaden(0)

Oct. 11, 2009 | 8:46 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - I think most of them are gone, but some others popped up.

2nd link - Gone, but more appeared

3rd link - Gone, but some appeared

4th link - A LOT of them popped up here. Also, the author is an unoriginal smartass for copying the reviews and changing it to reflect the reviewer.


Nov. 6, 2009 | 3:18 PM TurtleKirby101 says:

Hang on... so do we post links to flash reviews or not? In part 2 it said to, but here it says not too...?

Nov. 6, 2009 | 3:30 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

I said in Part 2 to ignore the shit written in here.

So yes, you can post links to flash reviews. I'm going to edit this post soon.


Nov. 6, 2009 | 3:21 PM TurtleKirby101 says:

Well I'm confused, but here they are anyway.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /446974

(negi2000, 0)

(mikester1342, 1)

Nov. 6, 2009 | 3:36 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Both done.

Pretend this post is Part 2 with the old comments terminated. Ignore the news post, and just leave links to abusive reviews.


Nov. 6, 2009 | 4:12 PM SuperMarioBrosS says:

http://leecario.newgrounds.com/art/

Look in each of his art. It should be pretty obvious.


Nov. 6, 2009 | 5:00 PM Basset says:

So, the original part 2 reached the 500 comment limit... and now we can post the abusive reviews links here?

Meh, it's ok for me.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517146
(3) bocodamondo
(1) tootr1
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517154
(1) jp105
(0) mustangdude89
http://spikeball99.newgrounds.com/rev iews/flash
(10) "WTF"
(10)"....."

Nov. 6, 2009 | 5:23 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Yes we can post it here. It's another replica of Part 2, except without the 500 comments.

1st link - All flagged

2nd link - All done

3rd link - Done


Nov. 6, 2009 | 5:28 PM Basset says:

http://walzabanks4.newgrounds.com/rev iews/flash
1 word reviews, floods...

Nov. 6, 2009 | 6:35 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Wow, just wow. It's worse than the crap I have seen today.

All done.


Nov. 7, 2009 | 8:29 AM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517174

Pretty obvious.

Nov. 7, 2009 | 10:00 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

I saw that during judgment, and was sure that there would be "TWILIGHT SUCKS ASS" reviews or something similar.

All done.


Nov. 7, 2009 | 12:30 PM SuperMarioBrosS says:

http://crebb.newgrounds.com/flash/

Go through each of his flashes, and flag all abusive reviews in there.


Nov. 7, 2009 | 1:25 PM armydanywolf says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517249

look at this!

Nov. 7, 2009 | 2:55 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

It got flagged for administrative review. It must have broke the rules somehow.

Did you flag it?


Nov. 7, 2009 | 4:36 PM Stretchysumo says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517239
+4 abusive reviews!

Nov. 7, 2009 | 4:39 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All 4 done.

Exactly how long have you had the gold whistle?


Nov. 8, 2009 | 8:45 AM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517333

AlphaZombie126 (0)

Not sure what to do with the review below that one (by ShadowCreeper).

Also, I saw that other review on my submission; it's gone now, but I'm surprised it didn't get deleted a while back.

Nov. 8, 2009 | 10:28 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

It's gone, but a new one by Bluegluebunny (0) needs to be flagged.

Looks like that review by ShadowCreeper is gone; I don't see it.

~

It's probably because nobody knew it was abusive or not enough people have flagged it. I caught it, so it's gone for now.

I don't quite remember the review, so I can't say much more than that.


Nov. 8, 2009 | 3:50 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Do the mods even give him this ban?

Like what is up with that?

I reported him to a mod, and yet he's still banned...


Nov. 8, 2009 | 3:51 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

That was just beyond pathetic.

All done.


Nov. 8, 2009 | 4:18 PM Basset says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/516423
first 2.

Nov. 8, 2009 | 6:06 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Both done.


Nov. 8, 2009 | 6:20 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - I flagged about 60 reviews in there. True goldmine indeed.

2nd link - That's another mini goldmine in my view.


Nov. 8, 2009 | 6:59 PM ihatesonic1 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/ih atesonic1/pencil-guy
Gold mine luz

Nov. 8, 2009 | 7:20 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Why the fuck are my flags still there?

I flagged those awhile ago, and yet they still remain.

Is it that Art Portal reviews are not sent to review moderators or something?

I'll PM a mod that submission, and ask her to terminate the abusive ones.


Nov. 8, 2009 | 9:46 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/410923
GOLDMINE!

Nov. 9, 2009 | 8:43 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Agreed!

I'm still wading through that pile.


Nov. 8, 2009 | 10:12 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517410

DarkDatch (0)

Nov. 9, 2009 | 8:45 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Gone.


Nov. 8, 2009 | 11:39 PM ihatesonic1 says:

As you might of known, this account used to belong to my brother, and he had an alt, and that alt had a lot of abusive reviews, but the ones after June were mine, feel free to delete them

http://atsiv.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash

Nov. 9, 2009 | 8:51 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.

However, don't make more abusive reviews with this one. If the review mods find out, they will stop deleting these reviews, and will just permanently ban it (and ask Wade to terminate it).

If they feel picky, they may track down your main account, and permanently ban that from reviewing as well.


Nov. 9, 2009 | 3:34 PM tornadopilot2 says:

SWEET! I got a gold whistle! Now for abusive reviews.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517439
yny (0)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/405036
chillbro (2) Jaller333 (4)

Nov. 9, 2009 | 8:52 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

CONGRATULATIONS on the gold whistle! Now you're 1 step away from the ultimate whistle!

All those reviews have been terminated.

Also, damnit Chillbro for leaving an abusive review.

Updated: Nov. 9, 2009, 9:05 PM

Nov. 9, 2009 | 4:10 PM ihatesonic1 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517458
lots here

Nov. 9, 2009 | 8:54 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

I agree. There probably were more when you got to it.

I still got like 5 flags, so that's good enough.


Nov. 9, 2009 | 4:32 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /143805
yoshi07 (0)

Nov. 9, 2009 | 8:55 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

It has been deleted.

Also, was the review in the 2008-2009 range? Because I see reviews made from even 2006 in there.


Nov. 9, 2009 | 4:48 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/392723
Macdady00 (0) someguy3657 (0) LordBarron (0)

Nov. 9, 2009 | 8:56 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All 3 are gone, but more have appeared in there.


Nov. 9, 2009 | 5:06 PM jakenator85 says:

http://doogie88.newgrounds.com/review s/
Portal Defenders
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/517475
sonc624(10) CheaterBoy999(10) havegum(0) Awestehn(10) GlassCake(10) ~ PAGE TWO ~ sammo158(1) greg-arganda(0) dude1530754(2) CamoChris(10) GuitarmasterX7(10) DrouxtheShredder(10)

Nov. 9, 2009 | 8:59 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done

2nd link - A large majority of those reviews have disappeared, but still the remaining ones have been taken care of.

Also, long time no see bro.


Nov. 9, 2009 | 5:19 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/453517
glinchman543 (0) TheFreakyGuy (0) CombineAdvisor (0)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/448109
kerim67 (0) TheBudderDog (0) someNEWB (0) togashi21 (0)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/377018
manarcurew (5) fratman23 (1)

Nov. 9, 2009 | 9:03 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Those reviews are kind of old, but ok...

2nd link - Again, kind of old...

3rd link - Still, old reviews... also both are gone.

I still have finished all of them nevertheless.


Nov. 9, 2009 | 9:04 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.

Strangely enough, it turned into "There's some debate, but overall people think this is a useless review." after flagging it.


Nov. 9, 2009 | 6:58 PM Stretchysumo says:

http://tricky17.newgrounds.com/review s/flash
Why, hello there abusive reviews.

Nov. 9, 2009 | 9:06 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Hahahahaha, that's a good catch!

Done.


Nov. 9, 2009 | 9:12 PM Stretchysumo says:

http://zonex99.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash
A couple here

Nov. 10, 2009 | 3:03 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

No abusive reviews as of now.

They probably have been gone.


Nov. 10, 2009 | 3:05 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Looks like the vast majority has disappeared.

I only got a few of them.


Nov. 10, 2009 | 2:57 AM TurtleKirby101 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /67037

There are LOTS here.

Nov. 10, 2009 | 3:10 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Wow I think I finished over 60 reviews in there...

That's probably enough gold to get a bronze whistle!


Nov. 10, 2009 | 6:55 AM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517517

theworldsucksballs (0)
Huntmaster (0)

Nov. 10, 2009 | 3:12 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Wow anti-series flashes really piss off fanboys to a level that is worse than stupidity.

Done. There are more than that I think.


Nov. 10, 2009 | 7:36 AM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517511

Jodran666 (0)

Nov. 10, 2009 | 3:12 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.


Nov. 10, 2009 | 3:57 PM ihatesonic1 says:

would anyone mind flaging these reviews?!? I don't want to get banned because of my little brother's comments

Nov. 10, 2009 | 4:06 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

You won't be banned for those reviews being deleted though.

Don't make new abusive reviews with that account, and you'll be fine.

Just ditch that account if you want to, or use it as an alt.


Nov. 10, 2009 | 4:13 PM SuperMarioBrosS says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/517544
- Obvious abuse is obvious

http://twilight.newgrounds.com/review s/audio
* Look at who I'm targeting; a 13 year old popular attention whore in the BBS. Too bad, since I'm hurting him in the field I'm an expert at. I'm going to hurt popular BBS celebrities this way. If they want to treat me like shit on the BBS, I'll treat them like shit on an area they are weaker at.
- Flag the 3-star one word review, and the 0-star one.


Nov. 10, 2009 | 4:52 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Already beaten you to it.

Although since the comment gap is 2 minutes, you deserve credit.


Nov. 10, 2009 | 4:18 PM ihatesonic1 says:

err, delete that comment, I wasn't aware

Nov. 10, 2009 | 4:53 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Don't worry about it.

Just flag the abusive reviews in there.


Nov. 11, 2009 | 2:55 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done. Don't bother reading the 10-starred reviews.


Nov. 11, 2009 | 2:06 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/420568
BrlaN64 (0) Alexandergoldstar (0) Kingxp3000 (2)

Nov. 11, 2009 | 2:57 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Two of them gone, one still remains.

Also, there is 1 review complaining about front page, and 1 review that says "I lol'd" (10).


Nov. 11, 2009 | 2:35 PM tornadopilot2 says:

Treasure hunted flashes means theres abusive reviews.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/379935/1
AllenKenny (0) Dark-Blitz (3)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/511348
ninja37 (6) Zyconis (7) daemonnumber1 (3) gamerhog (0) 1-ceth (6)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/454846
Jetset1 (4) Themurdererguy (0) ChronoCrusade (0) noman980 (1)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/502980
richieguitar (5) SakuraSavior (5)
Make sure to look at some treasure hunting flashes for reviews that says "Why is this on the front page?"

Nov. 11, 2009 | 3:29 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - The 0 star one is gone, but the other one still remains.

2nd link - I think there are way more than that...

3rd link - Done. Still think there are more than that...

4th link - Done

Yeah that's what is making me find more than what is listed.


Nov. 11, 2009 | 3:23 PM SuperMarioBrosS says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/517627
- OBVIOUS ABUSE IS SO FUCKING OBVIOUS!


Nov. 11, 2009 | 7:52 PM CelestOrion says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/liste n/248659
If you ask who it is, I'll throw you into a raging fire with aids and weasels. Shameless Plug #28 of my audio, enjoy.

Nov. 11, 2009 | 9:09 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Okay, I'm prepared to be thrown in a raging fire, because I can't find it.

All 10-star reviews, and 9 star review. Even the 9-star review isn't abusive.

Unless if I was late to the party...


Nov. 11, 2009 | 7:56 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517666

Spike0804 (0)

Nov. 11, 2009 | 9:10 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Gone, but there is another 0-star review in there.

Make sure to flag it. Also, it looks like that fag (excuse my language) has stolen an account, or the owner of the account decided to join the fad or whatever.


Nov. 11, 2009 | 8:07 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/377964/2
nerdzilla91 (1)

Nov. 11, 2009 | 9:10 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Finished.


Nov. 11, 2009 | 8:29 PM ihatesonic1 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517683

It is an advertisment for Jibjab

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517682

This was stolen form Jibjab

Nov. 11, 2009 | 9:11 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Both have been blown on.

Now to see if it will be flagged for administrative review...


Nov. 11, 2009 | 9:17 PM ihatesonic1 says:

this http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517688, is stolen form here, flag it

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /394425

Nov. 11, 2009 | 9:48 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

^^^ BOTH flashes have been flagged for administrative reviews. Great catches!

Also, I have blown this one as well. Now HOPEFULLY this will also be flagged.

This is the first time I have blown 3 flashes in a day in my entire NG career.


Nov. 12, 2009 | 4:11 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517068

jaymison (0)

The submission is front paged, so you may have to search a bit. It's the newest review as of this comment.

Nov. 12, 2009 | 7:12 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Don't see it.


Nov. 12, 2009 | 7:05 PM Stickman91 says:

Update: If you haven't gotten around to jaymison's review yet, don't bother; it's gone.

Nov. 12, 2009 | 7:12 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Okay, thanks for the heads up!


Nov. 12, 2009 | 8:19 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517752
Coby089 (0) Daaku026 (0)
might be more by the time I posted this.

Nov. 12, 2009 | 9:42 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

You're right; more has popped up.

But the two you have mentioned have been flagged.


Nov. 12, 2009 | 10:57 PM jakenator85 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/517767
ShadowCreeper(4) Dekar-Serverbot(0)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517752
coston(0) devonmartino(4) EggplantHigh(1)

Nov. 13, 2009 | 4:45 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All gone for both links.


Nov. 13, 2009 | 5:36 PM WeirdAlthe3rd says:

CelestOrion told me to come to this new post and I found an abusive reveiw for you to flag.
http://kota-anakin.newgrounds.com/rev iews/

Nov. 13, 2009 | 6:34 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

It would be helpful if you can pinpoint what reviews you think are abusive, but both have been flagged.

Also, those reviews are old. Please don't target old reviews. Although they have been made in 2008, it's over 2 years old.


Nov. 13, 2009 | 9:35 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - 0-bombed

2nd link - Done

3rd link - All of them in there currently are abusive.

4th link - Done. Flag this one too: glazov123 (0)

5th link - Done. Backseat modding does not bode you well here, along with the BBS.

6th link - Wow that 10 star review was totally retarded. All done.

7th link - Done

8th link - I'm going to flag it, but I suggest you don't. Unless if you want to. It's a general review, and does not give proper advice. I see it as abusive, but don't flag it just in case the mod that gets it clears the flag.

Tomorrow I'm going to stop being a lazy shit and start dumping abusive reviews here. Sure guide work and all is preventing me from doing that, but I feel kind of guilty...


Nov. 14, 2009 | 9:28 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Wow that's a lot of reviews.

All finished. Also, IMO, draw some more, and improve. Then you'll shove out some decent works of arts, and slap the faces of those that gave you shit.

Plus I think you're kind of rushing your pieces of art. Take your time, do as many sketches/drawings you need to perfect every detail, and then copy it all into one sheet, and upload it. Rushing won't get you anywhere.

Updated: Nov. 14, 2009, 9:40 AM

Nov. 13, 2009 | 10:47 PM jakenator85 says:

Some more reviews popped up in my recent comment. Plus, the one I posted saying "Blam this", passed, and has abusive reviews.

Nov. 14, 2009 | 9:28 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done. I noticed it too.


Nov. 14, 2009 | 12:24 AM ihatesonic1 says:

I am starting to think that art reviews don't count in flags.

Nov. 14, 2009 | 9:30 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

I have a strange feeling about that too... because I have flagged some reviews on a person's art, and those flags are there after FOUR MONTHS! Normally the reviews we flag are deleted within 24 hours.

I'm going to send a PM to Rob, and ask him what's up with the flagging system of art reviews.

Until then, keep shoving them in. I'll post his response here, if I get it.


Nov. 14, 2009 | 1:17 AM CelestOrion says:

@Shadowthewerehog: If it weren't for the fact that I'm out looking for whistle points, I'd leave those reviews there, because your art deserves them. I can't even begin to correlate your pics with the word 'art'. The art portal isn't for MS Paint pics, unless you're a pixel artist, which you're clearly not. There is no detail in any of your pics, nor is there proportion or logical sense. The Sonic pic was your best, I'll admit, but it's still shit. You only attract those sort of reviews by posting unskilled artwork there. People will flame you.
So keep posting shitty pics, everyone could use some whistle points. ;)

Nov. 14, 2009 | 9:38 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

You still should flag them bro, since nobody likes shit from abusive reviewers. Plus if they get punished for it, they hopefully will learn to never make those reviews again, and therefore prevent harassing other aspiring artists.

Yes I agree, the Sonic picture is kind of crap. But, compared to the other pieces he submitted, it's a significant improvement over the others. Everybody starts somewhere. Even the best artists have submitted some real shitty pieces of work, whether it's flash, audio or art. It's a normal trend. Some, like you, may be lucky enough to have the gift of making masterpieces instantly. But not everyone has that, and they have to improve by posting their "crappy" art, and collecting the feedback (if any) to improve further.

Let him keep posting more art, as it is a way for him to improve. And if more abusive reviews pop up, we can flush them out.

Other than all that mentioned, I agree with the rest of your points.

Newgrounds wants to encourage contributors, not drive them away. A total loser and shit artist could become one of the best artists on the site if they keep practicing, posting more, and improving even further. Putting abusive reviews can easily shut off talent from others. The Audio Portal is the perfect example, where artists are deleting their music because of being discouraged. That's from 0-bombing, but still is discouragement nevertheless.


Nov. 14, 2009 | 8:51 AM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517848

RamzaRuglia (0)
maniac320 (0)

Nov. 14, 2009 | 9:59 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Both gone, but I suspect more will come.


Nov. 14, 2009 | 12:45 PM SuperMarioBrosS says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517914

I suspect more.


Nov. 14, 2009 | 2:20 PM armydanywolf says:

his flashes are just spam and they always passes judgement! then he change the description for "fuck you" " your all gay" or something like that! okay i wont write reviews for spams about how it passed... sorry again! i hate that guy!

Nov. 14, 2009 | 5:19 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

You're doing what he wants you to do: GIVING ATTENTION.

He's a fucking troll; ignore him. Rather, PM Wade with the link to the spam submission(s), and he will delete it (them). Who knows, maybe he will delete the fucker's account to finish it off.

Don't review spam submissions; it's likely to be flagged and deleted. Especially since it's spam, it's really hard to make it a "legitimate" review (non-abusive review). Do NOT feed the troll!

I know it is tempting to say "FUCK YOU" to the author, but that's going to encourage him to make more. All spammers are looking for "FUCK YOU", "GO DIE IN A FIRE", "GO FUCK YOURSELF" and other similar comments. They want attention, be it negative or positive. Just drop a message to Wade explaining the situation, and he will send him to the Eulogies. To ensure it will be taken care of, make sure the subject is "Newgrounds Help - Portal Spam" or Wade may accidentally delete it with spam PM he gets.

Other than that, just ignore the submissions. If everybody did that, these spammers will get bored and eventually leave Newgrounds and troll elsewhere.

By the way, can you give the URL to that asshole's page? I will drop a line to Wade, and hopefully it will be settled.


Nov. 14, 2009 | 3:36 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /487689

ve-chan (2)
NamiHADOKEN (0)

Nov. 14, 2009 | 5:19 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Both gone.


Nov. 14, 2009 | 4:23 PM Basset says:

http://filitox.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash
1 Word reviews...

Nov. 14, 2009 | 5:20 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All gone.


Nov. 14, 2009 | 5:16 PM Basset says:

WTF WTF WTF I got deity??????

Oh shit something must be wrong.... it was too fast.

Nov. 14, 2009 | 9:26 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Congratulations! Mission accomplished!

That's funny, because you and jakenator got the deity in the same day!


Nov. 14, 2009 | 5:23 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/517676/42/score

hank01 (8)
CrankyMcGregor (0)

Also, Silver Whistle! :D

Nov. 14, 2009 | 9:28 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Damn that's 3 people that leveled up today! 2 to deities, and 1 to silver!

New record has been set on the history of the Newgrounds Guide: Basset and Jake got deity, and Stickman91 got silver in ONE FUCKING DAY: 11/14/09

Anyway both reviews have been flagged. In the last page, however, there are more abusive reviews to flag. Mainly ones with 0 stars.


Nov. 14, 2009 | 5:29 PM Stickman91 says:

And another...

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /511160
baileyj43 (0)

I'm not sure about the one by mydarksides. It looks more useless than abusive.

Nov. 14, 2009 | 9:30 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Yeah I agree, that one is useless. Good thing you didn't go for it; some people would say it's a 1-word review without a second thought.

I don't even know why people do that. It's really stupid.

While that is useless, the 0 star review by Neon5162 is abusive.


Nov. 14, 2009 | 5:32 PM Basset says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/513815
Almost every review with low score.

Nov. 14, 2009 | 9:32 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Going to flag beyond the deity huh? I like that. No, I LOVE that!

Anyway, that was a nice little goldmine. All done.


Nov. 14, 2009 | 10:37 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done

2nd link - Why would you flag that? It's more like borderline than downright abusive. I would not flag that.


Nov. 15, 2009 | 12:02 AM Nayhan says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/517968
reviews by Puffletaco and hotgunz,
not sure bout theNocturnal, is being abusive not to the author though?!?

Nov. 15, 2009 | 9:08 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Welcome!

One gone (Puffletaco), one remains. Plus look back in the flash and you'll notice that more have appeared.

Flag the one by theNoctural. Also, reviews don't have to be abusive to the author in order to be deleted. Unhelpful reviews can be deleted as well.

For more info, read this:

http://supermariobross.newgrounds .com/news/post/292395


Nov. 15, 2009 | 12:34 AM Nayhan says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/430706/1
figgypwns - spam and abuse

Nov. 15, 2009 | 9:09 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

It has been deleted.


Nov. 15, 2009 | 12:46 AM jakenator85 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/517076/
Most of the reviews however, I'm not too sure about.

Nov. 15, 2009 | 9:18 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Start from the 6-star reviews, and go down from there.


Nov. 15, 2009 | 1:20 AM Shadowthewerehog says:

this guy spams everybody! http://thespammer.newgrounds.com/

Nov. 15, 2009 | 9:21 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

He better not spam the BBS or his reviews (he has 0 at least) if he doesn't want to get his ass banned.

Also, seriously, that user is a 2009 noob? How is it that that unoriginal name was not taken since a LONG time ago?


Nov. 15, 2009 | 10:35 AM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/494963/1
MadnessApple (10) Alexh731 (6) Jakex09 (10) colenpacmen (10) wizzi (9)
some useless one-word reviews.

Nov. 15, 2009 | 11:09 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

RETARDS!

All done.


Nov. 15, 2009 | 11:06 AM SuperMarioBrosS says:

http://specane.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash/

If you don't get a whistle level up after this, then I don't know what to say...

330 FUCKING ABUSIVE REVIEWS!

GO! GO! GO!


Nov. 15, 2009 | 11:38 AM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/517982

redadimisk (0)
XeromeX (0)
Xeotyx (0)
Blue-lunatic (1)

There'll probably be more for this one.

And that Specane guy... whoa. I found him by going to the BBS and coming across a spam thread he made. I figured that he might be churning out spam reviews as well, so I checked his profile, and whaddya know?!

I was gonna comment here about it until I saw you already mentioned him. I was literally flagging the reviews as they were being deleted! I think I got at least 75.

I wonder if he actually took the time to review hundreds of submissions, or if he just used a malicious script... well, either way, all his reviews are gone now.

Nov. 15, 2009 | 12:32 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

HOW. THE. FUCK. DOES. NEWGROUNDS. ALLOW. THAT. PIECE. OF. SHIT. TO. BE. 17.5. MB. LARGE?

Seriously, did Tom go insane with that? Even the best flashes here doesn't eat up that much space, let alone that piece of shit.

All done.

~

He had 500 reviews. I flagged only 230 though, because Evark was deleting them. One review was deleted EACH second.

I don't think it's a script. The site is programmed so that scripts can't run like that. If that's the case, some asshole could inject a virus that would flood to other people's computers when they view the infected page. My guess is that spammer picked out 500 random submissions, and flooded the review with all @@@@@@@@@@@ symbols. Then he submitted them all AT ONCE.

And he made a spam thread? WOW... how low can he go?


Nov. 15, 2009 | 12:48 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/376285
A submission with a fake title.
I wonder if we can ask Tom Fulp to make a collection for fake titled flashes?
If not Can you make a post for flashes that has a fake title?

Nov. 15, 2009 | 2:18 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

That flash has been reported like 20 times in Part 2...

Why should I make a post for flashes with misleading titles?


Nov. 15, 2009 | 1:27 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/437372
pg.1- megazelda (0) NG-Hunter (0) pspcrazy (0) pimpsurmom007 (0) dragonslayer23 (0) rcrkar (0) newgrounder4426 (0)
pg.2- tekishi (0) MidnasGaurdian (0) gamertotal (0) SUPERMAN1995 (0) hellldemiutz (0) Elizco (0) ilikeofnachos (0) arturo98 (0) minorkid (0)
pg.3- proganist (0) TXI09 (0) theslain (1) skyshooter123 (0) freakdude200 (1) tomisniedom (0) newcomer96 (0)
pg.4- I'm not sure

Summary- It's a goldmine!

Nov. 15, 2009 | 2:18 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Wow...

I'm still finishing through them...


Nov. 15, 2009 | 2:25 PM ihatesonic1 says:

Oh how I love Snooker

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/517987

Nov. 15, 2009 | 2:36 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Wow...

All done.


Nov. 15, 2009 | 2:36 PM SuperMarioBrosS says:

Seriously?

http://tomfulp.newgrounds.com/

9 comments... per SECOND?


Nov. 15, 2009 | 3:43 PM Stickman91 says:

^Holy hell! That's ridiculous!^

As of now, comments are still being added! I wonder who's behind this...

Also, for http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/437372, the review by M-Y on page 4 is abusive.

Nov. 15, 2009 | 4:18 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

It's that same faggot that spammed the 500+ abusive reviews. Don't load the page, or your computer may freeze. Although only 500 comments show, I think the page attempts to load all 80,000+ comments.

~

Almost all reviews in that flash are abusive! Okay, done.


Nov. 15, 2009 | 3:46 PM Stickman91 says:

And furthermore... http://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/ko ser/ederam
lukashafstrom (4)
Killerdx99 (9)

Nov. 15, 2009 | 4:41 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Both done.


Nov. 15, 2009 | 4:50 PM Orangebeef says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/368873
Lots of abuse here

Nov. 15, 2009 | 5:00 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Wow this is the 10th time this flash has been reported...

Still flagging them...


Nov. 15, 2009 | 8:07 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/ma tt-likes-swords/gunz
wolvesinthenight13 (9)

Nov. 15, 2009 | 8:35 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.


Nov. 15, 2009 | 8:39 PM jakenator85 says:

http://ldotta.newgrounds.com/reviews/

He deserves a ban.

Nov. 15, 2009 | 9:46 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

I couldn't agree with you even more.

Both flagged.


Nov. 15, 2009 | 10:03 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Both done

2nd link - Done

3rd link - That was lame. Done.

4th link - I don't know; maybe 50? Either way, pathetic review. In fact, I can't call it a review, since it would be insulting the word "review".

Horse shit is more like it.

5th link - Done

6th link - Done

7th link - It's fully composed of ASCII art. Flag it. That doesn't tell the author anything.

8th link - Inappropriate shitty review. Flag it. Also, ASCII does not protect a review from deletion.

9th link - Done

10th link - Done

11th link - Yes again. In fact, I wonder if these reviews actually get removed, or if the flags permanently stay there. Anyway, all done.

Boy that was HUGE!


Nov. 16, 2009 | 12:28 AM ihatesonic1 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517982
do i have to say?

Nov. 16, 2009 | 2:52 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Obvious abuse is obvious.

Done.


Nov. 16, 2009 | 3:11 AM Shadowthewerehog says:

u wanna join the NBI? we go around ng and capture spammers. we try to get them banned!

Nov. 16, 2009 | 2:52 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Uhh... this post (and another post) has been doing that since March...

So we already have a crew here that capture spammers.


Nov. 16, 2009 | 4:55 AM Shadowthewerehog says:

another spammer
http://spamasaurousrex.newgrounds.com /
how do you get guys like these banned?

Nov. 16, 2009 | 2:57 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

You PM Wade and explain the situation. If reasonable, Wade won't ban them, but terminate their account.

But Tom or Wade doesn't care if someone spams their user page with shit or whatever (provided that it isn't downright racist or illegal). It's only if those assholes bring their shit to the portal or BBS or harass many users in their user pages/PMs that require proper administration from an admin.

So don't bother reporting a nobody that spams their own user page; they won't care. Target the REAL trolls/spammers, such as ones that spam the portal, reviews, etc.


Nov. 16, 2009 | 11:34 AM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518073
MSlim (0)
killerbassist (0)

I didn't flag the one by xBrainchild; it's more useless than abusive, I think.

Nov. 16, 2009 | 3:02 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All 3 are gone.


Nov. 16, 2009 | 11:36 AM Stickman91 says:

One more:
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518078
OMGhaxedlol (0)

Nov. 16, 2009 | 3:21 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Gone.


Nov. 16, 2009 | 2:42 PM Orangebeef says:

http://perfectedidiot2.newgrounds.com /reviews/flash/1
he has lots of bad reviews, some of which are "helpful" ???

Nov. 16, 2009 | 3:22 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Most of them are useless, but yes some are abusive.

As for the "helpful" rating, only fanboys and retards marked that as helpful.


Nov. 16, 2009 | 6:56 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /493332

Blood62 (10, one worder)

The review is pretty recent; it'll probably be in the first or second page.

Nov. 16, 2009 | 7:08 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.

Also, the new user page tool ([delete all by user]) is annoying me now...


Nov. 16, 2009 | 7:07 PM Stickman91 says:

But wait... there's more! (As always.)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /389149
cheapcheat (0)
Semh2 (0)
thamasta20GHOST (0)
RumbleRabbit (0)

Sort the reviews by score and check out the last page or so to find these.

I'm not sure about the reviews by RockGames and nick1031 (they're probably on the second or third to last page).

Also, I wouldn't be surprised if more popped up for this submission.

Nov. 16, 2009 | 7:11 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Looks like 1 of them is gone, but took care of the others.

I actually would be, since the flash was made in 2007.

And what page are they in; by ratings or by time submitted?


Nov. 16, 2009 | 10:09 PM chillbro says:

ahem
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /334750

Nov. 17, 2009 | 4:04 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Wow...

That a nice little goldmine. Good catch!


Nov. 16, 2009 | 11:20 PM ihatesonic1 says:

http://supersaiyancrashd.newgrounds.c om/reviews/flash

But not PoGonYuTo - The Game, I don't think its abusive

Nov. 17, 2009 | 4:04 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.


Nov. 17, 2009 | 4:15 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

First of all, how did you lose your deity whistle?

1st link - Done

2nd link - Not too many here, since the majority of the reviews are made in 2007.

3rd link - Done

4th link - Done

5th link - Done


Nov. 17, 2009 | 2:43 AM Nayhan says:

Dammit!!! I got demoted to garbage. I'll have to only flag the things I'm certain are abusive/ spam. I did accidentally flag a review that was quite helpful and abiding by the rules, could that have caused my demotion?

Nov. 17, 2009 | 4:18 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Just flagging one non-abusive review can cause a huge dent on your whistle. So yes that is possible.

However, we have users with 2 deity whistles (myself included), and 1 that is close to deity, so you should be able to get out of garbage in no time!

I got out of garbage WITHOUT any help, so at least you're better off. It took like 2 months for me to get out of garbage.


Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:58 AM armydanywolf says:

I GOT SILVER! YAAAAAAY! THANKS YOU AGAIN!

Nov. 17, 2009 | 4:19 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

CONGRATULATIONS!

Now 2 more levels to go! Your next target is GOLD!


Nov. 17, 2009 | 12:57 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518182

mostdishonorable (0)

Nov. 17, 2009 | 4:22 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

That review is currently in the 4th page as I write this, and I bet that it will be in the 6th page in another 3 hours.


Nov. 17, 2009 | 2:43 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518200

WhipWhop (0)

Nov. 17, 2009 | 4:23 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Gone. Reviews in spam flashes normally disappear quickly, since that is the only place noobs rely on for whistle points.

Oh by the way, congrats for making the 100th comment on this post!

Now 20% of this post's life span is gone.

Updated: Nov. 17, 2009, 5:41 PM

Nov. 17, 2009 | 5:40 PM Basset says:

http://jwnyor.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash

First 3
http://deathsagax.newgrounds.com/revi ews/flash
First 2
http://poppithemaster.newgrounds.com/
reviews/flash

The 3 rated 0
http://bar12.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash
1 word reviews... Not sure about the Tankmen Infinity one.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518214
Skullkan6
TheJamster
IRJesoos
Thornblade
matrix6977
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518203
Wojoe66

I'm kinda more confortable with gold than deity haha

Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:27 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done

2nd link - Done

3rd link - Done

4th link - Done. I would leave that one alone. Crappy review and poor grammar, but not really abusive.

5th link - Wow. I seriously flagged almost the entire first page of reviews.

6th link - Done

How so? I like the deity better, since you got the ultimate whistle, and whistle points come by faster.


Nov. 17, 2009 | 5:50 PM Basset says:

http://ripvanfish.newgrounds.com/revi ews/flash
4 on page one, 2 on page two.
http://souldred.newgrounds.com/review s/flash
1 word reviews and one rated 1.

Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:34 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done

2nd link - Done. You also should track down blatant useless reviews and flag those too.


Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:39 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done

2nd link - Fanboyism reviews. Done.

3rd link - Done, although I feel bad for the guy...

4th link - Done.


Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:12 PM ihatesonic1 says:

reviewing in differant language isn't abusive.

Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:39 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

They are actually.

However, some mods feel differently rather than other mods when it comes to reviews in other languages.


Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:23 PM SuperMarioBrosS says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518262

Obvious abuse is fucking obvious.


Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:38 PM Basset says:

He had a couple reviews insulting in english in page 1, but they have already been deleted.
http://goodkarmaninja.newgrounds.com/
reviews/flash/2

But this ones still remain:
AA- Pico day
Pico's Berserker:The Game
[uu] pico day (page 3)

Reviewing in a languaje that the author doesn't speak, is abusive. (Bah, at least a review mod told me so)

Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:43 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Took care of them in the first comment. I was late to the party I guess.

Also, if they get cleared, don't bother flagging them again.

I wouldn't be surprised if most of the review mods say that it is abusive if the author can't speak that language.

However, what most people overlook is that they flag all reviews in other languages than English, even those that have the author's response in the same language.


Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:39 PM jakenator85 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518277

HURRY, FLAG IT!

It was submitted already after being blammed with no visible or significant changes made.

Original:
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517971

Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:44 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done!

And I'm trusting you on this one too.

Seeing that the original got blammed, I wouldn't be surprised if this one did too...


Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:53 PM Basset says:

Shit. In times like this ^ is when I want the deity whistle.
Let's hope other users flag it. (crosses fingers)

Nov. 18, 2009 | 4:12 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

It got blammed.

And yes, the deity whistle is very useful in these cases.


Nov. 17, 2009 | 11:01 PM Basset says:

http://utgard-loki.newgrounds.com/rev iews/flash
Check the dates of the reviews.

Nov. 18, 2009 | 4:13 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Unless if I'm missing something, all of them have been made in 2003 and earlier.

There's nothing to flag there.


Nov. 18, 2009 | 7:38 AM Nayhan says:

I was wondering why you make so many blank posts that don't do anything?

Nov. 18, 2009 | 4:14 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

They will do something when I am ready to get off my ass and work on my guide.

This post is part of the NG guide, and the blank posts will become guide posts soon.


Nov. 18, 2009 | 10:54 AM Basset says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/214396
Fanboyism
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/311740
4 there
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/294398
4 more
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/72498
ihatesonic1 <-- Aw shit...
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /140611
Generatieon
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /473695
supercrazynintendo
ZyNkS, Mhazard, crzyman562,xXElementKidXx, burninglove789, gamerdude99, Riakun, supersticky13, omberman, Sonic369, BART999, NikSchemel, AnThOnY, cOoL32, peg92

When I see some advice for the future, I don't flag it. That's why I didn't post some of them...
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/484337
First one

Nov. 18, 2009 | 4:23 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done

2nd link - Done

3rd link - Done

4th link - I know it sucks. But if we were to clean up abuse, we have to do it...

5th link - Done

6th link - Wow nice goldmine. Done.


Nov. 18, 2009 | 5:26 PM jakenator85 says:

Abusive flash!
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518341
Since gaddafi is islamic, I'd say it is offensive towards muslims.

Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:17 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

It has been blammed.

At least it has been deleted.


Nov. 18, 2009 | 5:30 PM jakenator85 says:

But are two Deities alone really not enough to get an abusive flash pulled? Because the abusive flash I posted the was re-submitted, got blammed, not removed, and you and I both flagged it.

How many just Deity flags would it take to remove a flash?

Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:22 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

From what I heard, it takes about 3-5 deity whistles in order to pull out a flash from the portal, or somewhere like 20-30 normal whistles. Now with blammed & resubmitted flash, not many people will catch and flag that, so the chances of it passing and unflagged is slightly higher. However, 0-bombing it will lower the chances as well too.

Make sure you whistle it AND 0-bomb it, so that if not enough flags get in, it has a chance to be blammed.


Nov. 18, 2009 | 5:43 PM jakenator85 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518337
sportsmaster8(0)

Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:23 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Gone, but there are a couple others in there.

Also, where the fuck is Celest?


Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:26 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - What is it with these "Sonic vs ___________" flashes popping out of nowhere? Anyway, done. I think there are 4 in there.

2nd link - Done. That was so retarded and lame and childish that it was actually funny.


Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:39 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - This "noob" needs to learn on how to write a proper damn review. Also, look at his 1 news post. Instant retardation.

2nd link - Done.

3rd link - There are a lot there actually. A little more than 10 to be exact.

4th link - 2 actually. The 1-word review (10) and the shitty 0-star review (0).

5th link - Finished.


Nov. 18, 2009 | 7:31 PM WeirdAlthe3rd says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518310/1
BrigadierD (0)
Killerdx99 (0) I'm not sure about this one.
Protomix (0)

Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:43 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Welcome!

All have been flagged (including the one by Killerdx99, since that was utterly pointless to the author). There are actually some more if you look at the last page after clicking the "rating" button.

Updated: Nov. 18, 2009, 9:44 PM

Nov. 18, 2009 | 7:40 PM Basset says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/505307
Flagged like 20 reviews in the first 13 pages.
http://dinoface.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/4
Page 4 and 7.

Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:55 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - You weren't kidding too. All done.

2nd link - Done.


Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:58 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.

Damn how many reviews are you bringing?


Nov. 18, 2009 | 8:17 PM Basset says:

http://neiko00.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash
3 there
http://gamechild214.newgrounds.com/re views/flash/2
Apartment 1337
Falcon Punch Re-Animated
Awesome Invaders! (page 3)
What is roblox (page 4) <--- ???
This Is PINGAS!
Figure Boredom Episode 1
Short - Crap (page 5)
How 2 Succeed on NG (page 7)
CD-i Phillips is awesome (page 9)
how to make a game! (page 10)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/288588
A couple there.

Nov. 18, 2009 | 10:09 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - I actually flagged 5 in there.

2nd link - Wow that was a lot. All done.

3rd link - Done.


Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:29 PM Basset says:

Stolen flash.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518356
Original:
http://www.multigames.com/game/Polar_
Bear_Snowboard-213kch45

Ok, don't know if this one is the original but the user registered today and the e-mail he used is different from the one shown in the credits.

Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:52 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

If that is the case, then chances are that it actually is stolen.

I blew it anyway. Now to see if it is flagged.

The author's comments also is suspicious. Like how the commentary looks like it is rushed, by giving a very mediocre description of the game...

*EDIT* It passed. Oh well; we can't flag everything we blow on!

Updated: Nov. 18, 2009, 9:59 PM


Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:40 PM Basset says:

Abusive flash ("Free blam point")
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518359

Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:49 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

It's probably going to get blammed anyway by statwhores, but done.

Also, I got that PM when I was finishing through these comments. Nice technique too!


Nov. 18, 2009 | 9:49 PM ihatesonic1 says:

Thank you Basset, thats one less abusive review out of this hacked account.

Nov. 18, 2009 | 10:03 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

What do you mean "hacked account"?

Unless you're referring to the time when you stole it from the real owner...


Nov. 18, 2009 | 10:01 PM Basset says:

^ "How many reviews are you bringing?"

Those are only about 25% of the ones I flagged all day.

I want deity back! LOL

Nov. 18, 2009 | 10:12 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Wow that's a lot then! I need to keep up with defending the portal, as guide-related crap is pulling me behind.

Keep working! Also, why are you still stuck in gold? When jakenator went down, he got deity the next day. Unless you accidentally flagged some non-abusive reviews...


Nov. 18, 2009 | 10:16 PM Basset says:

I flagged a couple <2007 by mistake a long time ago... maybe they got cleared

But I'm still thinking I got deity by some kind of bug or something like that. It was too fast.

Nov. 19, 2009 | 7:01 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

That probably might have been it. That still is unusual, since mods clear without penalty for that.

I doubt it was a bug. You flagged tons of reviews, so the deity came by fast.


Nov. 18, 2009 | 10:44 PM Basset says:

http://shiloweston1.newgrounds.com/re views/
He wants to know how to make a video... and asks it everywhere.

Nov. 19, 2009 | 7:02 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Don't really see much. I must have missed it.

Oh, and isn't this the guy who was obsessed with Mario and made abusive reviews saying Mario can pwn Sonic's ass or whatever?


Nov. 19, 2009 | 12:18 AM Nayhan says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518347
Utgard-Loki (5) Axel-Blade (10) i don't care if he was joking
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518338
Avaloniromman (1) nick1031 (0)
evilBro92 (5) damon105 (3)

If someone just quotes something from the flash and says 'lol' what should I do?
And if you ask me you've got plenty of room for more guide posts.

Nov. 19, 2009 | 7:05 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Both have been terminated.

2nd link - All have been terminated.

Flag those reviews. Quoting a movie does not constitute a review, and just putting "lol" at the end is like saying "lol" without the quoted crap.

I know I got plenty of room, but I don't feel like using those 900+ extra news posts. I'll mess up the order of the guide then...


Nov. 19, 2009 | 12:19 AM Nayhan says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518337
Liljoegi (10)??

Nov. 19, 2009 | 7:05 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Probably was abusive, since it's gone.


Nov. 19, 2009 | 1:48 AM ihatesonic1 says:

look at this guy
http://kanamomashouse.newgrounds.com/
news/post/402422

He had a shit whistle, and now a sliver within 2 hours. =O

Nov. 19, 2009 | 7:07 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

He probably saw that goldmine regarding the fag that spammed @@@@@@@ in his reviews, and got points from that.

Cheap way of getting points.


Nov. 19, 2009 | 8:43 AM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518111
(Sort by score, last page of reviews)
Alco (1)
ZEGUER (0)
googzeez (0) <--- MAYBE... I'm not sure about this one so I didn't flag it.

Also, I saw the 100th comment message; thank you! :)
At this rate, Part 10 will hit 500 comments within a month, so you might want to start preparing for that...

Nov. 19, 2009 | 7:31 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Two are gone, I flagged the 3rd one you mentioned. No explanation to the review, and is also poorly written.

You're right; the speed is pretty fast here. I do have another escape hole though; Part 3 of the guide! That's right; the ABUSIVE REVIEW GUIDE is the next post to kill.

I'm going to kill all the parts of the old guide, since they are all redundant to the new guide. Once they are all dead, there comes the problem of relocating it...


Nov. 19, 2009 | 9:25 AM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/517544/1
flamingflash (0)

Always gotta keep an eye out for Turd of the Week!

Nov. 19, 2009 | 7:33 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

There are TONS of them in there!

A nice little goldmine that constantly replenishes itself over time.


Nov. 19, 2009 | 9:55 AM Stickman91 says:

A couple more: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518344/2
Exekeal (0)
PAZda09 (9)

Nov. 19, 2009 | 7:35 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

One gone, another remains.

Also, there are about 4 more reviews in there that need to be flagged...


Nov. 19, 2009 | 9:58 AM Stickman91 says:

Forget one; it's on the same submission (518344):
qinop (5)

Nov. 19, 2009 | 7:35 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

It's gone.


Nov. 19, 2009 | 3:29 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /447514

Spectre18 (0)
Sheepbomber (0)

Nov. 19, 2009 | 7:37 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Both gone.

I'm surprised that got 1,000 reviews...


Nov. 19, 2009 | 7:53 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - You weren't kidding either.

2nd link - This is another bronze mine too...

3rd link - Wow that is bad. What's with all these 2009 noobs shitting out like 100+ crappy reviews in a week? This guy didn't, but most of the people reported here are 2009 users that signed up within 2 months ago.


Nov. 19, 2009 | 9:34 PM Basset says:

http://neon5162.newgrounds.com/review s/flash
1 Word reviews and low score- no constructive criticism
http://mofabioss.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash
4 there
http://espectador.newgrounds.com/revi ews/flash
1 on page one and 1 on page two.
http://rabidshotgun.newgrounds.com/re views/flash
1 there
http://weegeevirus9000.newgrounds.com /reviews/flash
1 word review
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /508408
A couple there
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/511245
I found 2 there... maybe there are more but not sure.. it's a delicated subject.

Nov. 19, 2009 | 10:29 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done

2nd link - Done

3rd link - Done

4th link - Done

5th link - Done

6th link - I found 3...

7th link - I'm not really going to wade through much of the 9/11 reviews...


Nov. 19, 2009 | 10:46 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Wow...

All done.


Nov. 19, 2009 | 10:57 PM WeirdAlthe3rd says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /507016
sorarock11991199 (0)

Nov. 19, 2009 | 11:08 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Flagged.


Nov. 19, 2009 | 11:08 PM SuperMarioBrosS says:

http://sorarock11991199.newgrounds.co m/reviews/flash

I shouldn't have to say it...


Nov. 19, 2009 | 11:09 PM Basset says:

http://sorarock11991199.newgrounds.co m/reviews/flash
Always check other reviews from flooding users.

Nov. 19, 2009 | 11:12 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Look at the comment above you my friend...

Yes I always use that method. Normally I do that if they have more than 2 abusive reviews, but now I'm starting to use it if they have just 1 abusive review...


Nov. 19, 2009 | 11:40 PM ihatesonic1 says:

You chances are to 100%, its all that Wade doesn't want to premote a user with only 1 year of experiance, they would make other mods look bad and some mabe even jealous, thats way you arn't a mod, or mabe he doesn't trust you enough, and as for your guide, are you really going to go back to your blank posts and write a guide on every single one?

Nov. 20, 2009 | 5:53 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

My chances are not really 100%, more like 56%.

It's probably because of experience, not by trust.

Yeah I'm really going to be doing that. It's not hard. Hell, the guide isn't that hard because a massive quantity of it are blank posts. It's only the news post limit that is making it hard.


Nov. 20, 2009 | 7:10 AM Basset says:

Oh yeah. Deity is back.

I'll use it later. Now I'm at school LOL

Nov. 20, 2009 | 2:50 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Congrats!

Use it wisely! Also, Argentina doesn't have website filters in school?


Nov. 20, 2009 | 3:05 PM Basset says:

I don't really know... at least on my school there aren't.

When I wrote the last comment almost everyone was on facebook or youtube... and laughed at me because I was on Newgrounds (unknown website to them).
Because of that I installed keyloggers on every computer.

Let's see who laughes in a few days when all their facebook accounts get screwed by me.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /517068
supersticky13 (http://supersticky13.newgrounds.com/r eviews/flash)
taekjoon

Nov. 20, 2009 | 3:37 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

You lucky bastard; my school blocked NG AND YouTube (I don't care about YouTube anyway). I could make blank posts even in school if I could. It's understandable, but annoying.

Wow you're so mean! Haha, let's see them get screwed. Tell me what happens when they realized what happened. Look who's going to laugh now!

All reviews done.


Nov. 20, 2009 | 3:17 PM Basset says:

http://roboblock808.newgrounds.com/re views/flash
Check all pages.

Nov. 20, 2009 | 3:39 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All done. There are a lot of flooding ones too.


Nov. 20, 2009 | 3:20 PM Basset says:

I hate so much when I find a flash or an user with a lot of abusive reviews just 2 seconds after I post here.

http://slipknotkicksass.newgrounds.co m/reviews/flash

Nov. 20, 2009 | 4:36 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Oh well I can't blame you. Besides, it's not like it's abusing the guide anyway.

Happens to me all the time. Although since I can delete my comments, I can fix it.


Nov. 20, 2009 | 4:58 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done

2nd link - Don't flag anything from 2007 and beyond.

3rd link - Done

4th link - Done

I suppose it is. Probably 70 reviews in there that need to be terminated.


Nov. 20, 2009 | 6:41 PM ihatesonic1 says:

You would have been a mod if Wade didn't think things through. Other mods can get pissed at him for premoting an 08 user, while some takes 3-6 years to become one.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518492
vegankilla (0)

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518503/1/score
Utgard-Loki (0) (reffering to author)

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518498
ThePwner210 (0)
Acceletor (1) (he puts link)

http://thepwner210.newgrounds.com/rev iews/

Look for low scored flashes with no/ poorly made icons, thats what i do

Nov. 20, 2009 | 7:50 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Ok, enough with this "You would have been a mod" topic please. You're bringing the mood down for everyone, and make me feel like I'm superior to them/better than them, when I'm actually not.

You need at least 2 years of experience on Newgrounds, be a model poster on the BBS (that's the section I'm miserably failing now, which is why I said 56%), act mature (done), point out abuse to the mods, and know your shit (done). Along with model poster you should be a role model to other users (which is the same thing as being a model poster). That's a 2/4, plus I made it 1 year into NG, which makes it 50-60%. Those that took 6 years probably weren't up for the job until a year or 2 before nomination, in which they did everything to fulfill all expectations in being a good moderator.

Besides, how would they pissed for promoting an 2008 user when they promoted a 2009 user?

http://nathanallenpinard.newgroun ds.com/

Seriously. Sign up: 4/15/09

And again, like I said, I don't want mod status until I get the NG Guide finished, or at least the "Reviewing Submissions" section of the guide. I DO know that finishing the NG Guide will guarantee review mod status (although that's kind of not my target still) AND maybe BBS mod status (fat chance) if the BBS guides are well-written and if my BBS posts (which are shitty right now) are model examples.

Some mod (I think the name is TMM43) got mod status a few days after finishing his "The Guide to Newgrounds Audio". I made Part 1 way before I discovered his guide, so it's not like I tried to copy the method; I discovered it by accident. In fact, Part 1 was made in March, whereas his guide index was finished in 8/7/09.

Wade thinks shit real carefully. I'm sure he will think critically before nominating someone. Unless if it is an alt account of a mod/admin to fool the user base (ie. Transformer). Also, he asks the current moderators their opinion on nominating a user. They discussed that good stuff in the mod forum/lounge, where they will debate if a user that is brought up in the nominations will make a good mod or not.

Anyway...

1st link - Done

2nd link - I see some more in there. These are what I think are abusive:

DoctorCRaZ (4)
aggrocult (4)
Da-Jaeff (0)

3rd link - It's not just a link; he's trying to smartass his way through one of the review guidelines (he claimed indirectly that the movie is stolen) so that he can lower the damn review score. Anyway, both done.

4th link - All 3 have been flagged.

That's a nice method actually. Normally I look in the "LATEST SUBMISSIONS" part of the flash portal, and clean up any shit left in flashes that have a score of less than 2.00. And since they are all new, there is no fear of flagging an old review.

Updated: Nov. 20, 2009, 7:54 PM

Nov. 20, 2009 | 7:56 PM SuperMarioBrosS says:

http://utgard-loki.newgrounds.com/rev iews/flash

I shouldn't have to say anything for this either...


Nov. 20, 2009 | 8:09 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518546

Sproket (0)

Nov. 20, 2009 | 8:50 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done. There are a few others surrounding it too...


Nov. 20, 2009 | 8:37 PM ihatesonic1 says:

Be careful not to flag the 2003 ones, I did, right after I found out his account was created in 2000 :P

Nov. 20, 2009 | 8:51 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

I didn't. I should have put a warning. My bad. Although with all this flagging, I assumed everyone will be aware of that. Next time I'll put a warning.


Nov. 20, 2009 | 9:21 PM ihatesonic1 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/468893
You tell me, I am not sure

Nov. 20, 2009 | 9:40 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

I think everything but the 10-star review. Which means 8 reviews to flag.

Read before you flag though, as I may have overlooked something. Nobody's perfect.


Nov. 20, 2009 | 11:50 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://mo4form.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash/1
Peanut (10)
http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/liste n/279804
Fineas (0) Borg-Man (0) (first time actually looking through Audio reviews)
http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/liste n/18951
CleverMiam (0)
http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/liste n/16796
metamaster765167 (0)

I'm not sure about abusive audio reviews but these reviews I'm sure are abusive.

Nov. 21, 2009 | 10:19 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done

2nd link - Both reviews claim it as being stolen, so done. In fact, it is the real Metal Harbor one, so we got ourselves an audio thief.

3rd link - Gone, but the one by Jackillac (7) and koopaclock (5) are abusive.

4th link - You got to be kidding me; I flagged about 7 in there (mainly the low scored ones saying "unoriginal" or something similar). The one you mentioned are gone, but use the same flagging habits for flagging flash reviews (don't think differently), and you may notice some more are abusive. Mainly the ones I flagged are ones that are unhelpful to the artist.

Or maybe I fucked up, but I find those as abusive.

Audio reviews are not that different from flash reviews, but if you REALLY want to get technical with flagging a wide amount of reviews like you do for flash reviews, it's going to be vastly different. And complicated. I'm still a noob at flagging audio reviews, as I don't stretch the boundaries by much. The abusive audio guide is still not there, and you don't have any audio, so don't go wild with flagging audio reviews.

Updated: Nov. 21, 2009, 10:20 AM

Nov. 21, 2009 | 3:06 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done.

2nd link - All done

3rd link - Both have been flagged.

4th link - Asides from the one 0-starred review, what's abusive in there?

5th link - Done.

The 4th link isn't so obvious...


Nov. 21, 2009 | 1:00 PM Basset says:

http://jacketmatt.newgrounds.com/revi ews/flash
About 8 in all pages.
http://trippyhippo.newgrounds.com/rev iews/flash
Almost sure I posted this guy before.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518574
There's one now. I expect more.

Nov. 21, 2009 | 3:16 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done

2nd link - Yes you did. Done. However, why the hell are those reviews still there? We flagged some, and they still are there!

3rd link - Funny, it says that I have it flagged. Anyway, done.


Nov. 21, 2009 | 6:24 PM Basset says:

^
^There were a lot of abusive reviews in those links. It's just that now they get taken care of faster than before. Deity has a lot of weight when flagging.

Nov. 21, 2009 | 11:43 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Oh right I still think you have silver. Haha.

Good, that takes care of the job.


Nov. 21, 2009 | 7:12 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518605
Codificus (10)
44dman44 (8)
Geradine (0)
Eltro2kneo (0)

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518614
shnupit (0)
clubben100 (7)

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518616
Exekeal (0)
shnupit (0)

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /482914
AFXPusher (4)

Also, http://shnupit.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash. The review for "Level Editor" is so bad that it actually made me laugh! But there are many, many more...

Also, there are a bunch on the Turd of the Week you may have not seen yet.

So many!!

Nov. 22, 2009 | 8:39 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - 3 gone, 1 remains

2nd link - Flag the one by Interventionism (2)

3rd link - All gone

4th link - Gone

Shit I missed it! What did the review say?


Nov. 21, 2009 | 7:17 PM Stickman91 says:

http://exekeal.newgrounds.com/reviews /

There's also a few in there.

Nov. 22, 2009 | 8:39 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.


Nov. 21, 2009 | 8:01 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/494129
KingMako (10)

Nov. 22, 2009 | 8:39 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.


Nov. 21, 2009 | 8:13 PM WeirdAlthe3rd says:

http://hopeofunuverse.newgrounds.com/
reviews/flash

I love it when stupid people spam submission with comments like "HHHHHHHHHH"

Nov. 22, 2009 | 8:39 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Damn I missed it!

0 reviews.


Nov. 21, 2009 | 8:18 PM WeirdAlthe3rd says:

^Also keep an eye on him. He's still spaming on other people submissions.

Nov. 22, 2009 | 8:39 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

He probably is review-banned. Permanently banned I guess.

And do you think he's the same as that specane fag?


Nov. 22, 2009 | 1:46 AM ihatesonic1 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518662
Hurry! His account will be deleted soon as well as the flash, so hurry and flag these

Nov. 22, 2009 | 8:38 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

HOW THE FUCK DID THAT GET DAILY 2ND????

There are only few in there, so done. Lots of award-stealing reviews here too.


Nov. 22, 2009 | 6:06 AM TurtleKirby101 says:

Alright, I'm FINALLY gonna do another round up. I apologize for my laziness in the past.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518696

Fulcrum-Shift, 1

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518684

djhannesx, 0

Zekermei, 2

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518630

Dakine79, 0

Wojoe66, 1

tommy1234345, 0

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518629

Mzxlm, 0

killer0pancakes, 5

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518624

CamoChris, 0

parisXD, 0

Arichman, 0

Fakus, 0

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518612

CARPETMUNCHER, 1

Ghostdemon, 1

Ok that's all I can do for now.

Nov. 22, 2009 | 8:38 AM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done

2nd link - Done

3rd link - Done. There are a lot in the Turd of the Week now these days...

4th link - Done

5th link - Done

6th link - Done.


Nov. 22, 2009 | 10:16 AM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518696
Fulcrum-Shift (1)

Also, WHOA. I just saw that I've got Gold now. That took what, only a week or so?

Probably thanks to Specane, and of course to your abusive review posts and everyone who posts links here! Cool stuff. :)

Oh, and that funny review you missed said "I just couldn't give it a good score," or something very similar, without explaining why. Ha ha... kind of.

You know what might be a good idea? Temporary bans from reviewing. Actually, those might exist already, but I've never heard of them. Whenever someone gets banned from reviewing, it always seems to be a permanent thing.

It seems harsh to permaban on a first offense. If there were more temporary review bans, then maybe the ratio of acceptable to abusive reviews would be higher.

Review bans could be similar to BBS bans, with explanations of the ban from review mods. If a user continously abuses his review privileges, then he'll get permabanned. I'm pretty sure that's not how things currently work, but I might be wrong.

Nov. 22, 2009 | 5:23 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.

Congratulations on the gold! Now you are 1 step away from deity. If you are lucky as Basset, you should be able to get deity in 2 weeks! Although for me it took 3 weeks...

Oh that would have given me a chuckle actually. Haha.

~

There are temporary bans from reviewing. They last from 2-30 days, or permanent. So the minimum length a mod can ban someone from reviewing is 2 days. The max they can ban without permanently banning them is 30 days. Permanent ban is longest (obviously). It's the same as the BBS, except the BBS mods can only ban from 1-30 days, and there is no permanent ban option to the moderators (the only way they can permanently ban a user is to constantly lengthen the 30 day ban over and over again endlessly when it reaches close to 0 days).

You see the review ban as permanent, since that person doesn't make reviews for a few days. But they may have a 10 day ban (possibly) or even a permanent. Bans increase after each offense. Since we catch serious offenders, the bans will be longer.

Permanent bans don't happen unless the idiot has their... 100th abusive review deleted. Then the mod may consider permanently banning that user since obviously he/she is probably never going to learn their lesson. There are a lot more variables involved in it, but explaining them is probably going to confuse you. Same thing on the BBS; there are a lot of variables regarding banning a user from posting. They don't have full reign over how long they can take away a user's posting privileges. It's a complicated process, and explaining it is even more complicated.

The NG Guide will go in-depth about that, although I dunno if you will be here to see it (since "Site Moderation" is the last topic of the guide; unless I release a BETA version earlier).

Mods do give a ban reason for review bans, just like they do for BBS bans. When someone is review-banned, they will get a PM from M-Bot with the subject as "Review Ban Notification" in contrast to "Review Delete Notification". Once the user opens the PM, it will say "You have been banned from submitting reviews for the next X amount of days" and then following "This is the result of the review you have submitted for <<<<insert submission name>>>> at <<<<insert date>>>>:"

At the bottom of the PM it will say the reason for ban, and the moderator who banned you. Unlike the BBS, the moderators HAVE to expose themselves to the user they ban, whether they want to or not. In the BBS, mods can decide to sign their bans or not. Let us use Malachy as an example for a review ban notification, and say that the user is insulting the author constantly. The ban message will say:

~

The moderator "Malachy" has given the following reason for the ban:

"Continuously insulting flash artists"

Please review the review guidelines to prevent further action being taken against reviews you make.

Also, please note that repeated offenses will result in the termination of your user account.

~

So in short, there ARE temporary bans (2-30 days, and permanent) for reviews, and the ban message, AND the moderator who banned you is in the PM M-Bot sends to you. The user will be permanently banned for leaving more than 80-100+ abusive reviews. That is how the system work. How mods ban users and what reason they enter is much more complex and complicated material, and explaining it will probably confuse you (even explaining is hard). The same happens to the BBS, where the length they ban you for, the reason for ban, and whether or not they sign it is also complicated material.

What I DO know (and this is simple), is that they will follow your ban history and if they notice that it is your 2nd, 3rd or Xth offense, the ban length will increase over time. For review mods, if you broke your 20th or 30th or even 50th offense (depends on how serious the offense is), then they will permanently ban you from reviewing. There is a defined number of offenses someone must caused to be permanently banned for ALL rules. Like insulting the authors 30 times may warrant a permanent ban, but leaving like 80 unhelpful reviews (ie. "Crap gameplay, shit graphics, boring story") may warrant a permanent ban. Again, this gets much more complex, so I will leave it like that. The unwritten rules are also taken lightly too when users break them.

For the BBS, there is a max cap/length on the ban length for some of the rules (the maximum length is less than 30 days). But each rule is different, and the max length varies depending on the rules. The max length is higher for more serious rules, and lower for less-serious rules. Backseat modding may warrant a shorter ban, than trolling/insulting/harassing/flam ing other users, or making their stay on the BBS uncomfortable (which will result a longer ban). Backseat modding could result a max of 5 days (and no longer than that), but trolling/harassing users could have a 15 day max limit. Using racist/sexist language and posting tons of NSFW shit without warning could force the mod to exercise their power and ban that user for 30 days (the maximum ban length they can dish out). For any ban longer than 30 days for BBS mods, INCLUDING permanent BBS bans, they have to consult Wade.

Mods do use your BBS ban history to determine length of BBS ban, but they are not allowed to ban someone for backseat modding for 30 days, even if it is the 100th offense. They are not allowed full reign over ban lengths, even though they can ban someone for 30 days if they could. They use the 30 day limit for users that break "THE BIG ONES" and shorter bans with lower max ban length limits for "THE OTHER RULES".

Did that answer your question? Long-ass explanation, I know, but better to explain more than needed than insufficiently.

God damn I wish I could use HTML.


Nov. 22, 2009 | 12:28 PM Basset says:

http://hoohah.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash

Promotes another website.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/517544
Some there.

Nov. 22, 2009 | 5:24 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Done

2nd link - Done


Nov. 22, 2009 | 2:33 PM TurtleKirby101 says:

Hell yeah there are masses in TOTW! Way too many to mention!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/517544/3

Nov. 22, 2009 | 5:25 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Basset has beaten you to it.

But you're right; too many to mention!


Nov. 22, 2009 | 3:04 PM jakenator85 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518749
Blam this. If you watch, you'll know why!

Nov. 22, 2009 | 5:25 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Blammed.


Nov. 22, 2009 | 3:52 PM Basset says:

http://giancarlo99.newgrounds.com/rev iews/
A few flash reviews and one audio review.

Nov. 22, 2009 | 5:27 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.


Nov. 22, 2009 | 5:17 PM jakenator85 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518541
Mixhell(0)

Nov. 22, 2009 | 6:25 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.


Nov. 22, 2009 | 7:13 PM Stickman91 says:

http://icecold128.newgrounds.com/revi ews/

Everything on the first three pages with a score of three or lower (except for the review of Madness Unborn part 2).

Nov. 22, 2009 | 8:55 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All done.


Nov. 22, 2009 | 7:30 PM Stickman91 says:

And, WOW! That's a very nice explanation you've got there; thank you! It really did clear up a lot of questions I had! Don't worry about trying to explain all the other variables you mentioned; that response was way more than I expected, and more than enough to satisfy me. Again, thank you, it's very much appreciated!

But I have to ask: How were you able to find out so many details about the ban system? I've never seen any of that information posted anywhere on NG, and I've assumed that only mods have access to it.

Nov. 22, 2009 | 9:03 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Great, glad that it helped!

Two of the mods told me in PM how long they can ban users, what rules they can't harshly ban for, how many reviews it take for permabans, and all these variables. Some of the information were outright posted on the BBS in certain places (you have to do some mining to find them). The information is spread all over NG, and I had put it all together right here. In other words, I got this info from various sources, and matched all the puzzle pieces together.

There are MUCH more information I know of that is really hard to find on NG. Examples include how to become a mod on any section (it may look ironic since I'm not a mod, but I'm not doing any of the things needed to become a mod due to the guide), what tools each of the moderators have (although I have a pic of just the BBS mod tools), how the ban system works, the length of bans per rule, how to moderate something (I will look like a fucking idiot here), the power they have (ie. BBS mods can't delete posts 30+ days old) and more. All of those goodies will be posted when the guide reaches it's end point (some day...)

This stuff is very hard to find on NG; even SOME of the most helpful and knowledgeable/intelligent users that have been here awhile don't know this; even 2004 users probably don't know this. So take all that as a special gift to you.


Nov. 22, 2009 | 7:52 PM jakenator85 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /516606
Inu27

Nov. 22, 2009 | 9:04 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.


Nov. 22, 2009 | 7:58 PM Stickman91 says:

http://donkers.newgrounds.com/reviews /

Yeah, there's only one review (at least there is as of now), but it's still abusive. And this guy looks like he has "potential," if you catch my drift...

Nov. 22, 2009 | 9:05 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All done.

Potential? Haha.


Nov. 23, 2009 | 2:59 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518798
thesoundofcolor (1) 6dead6world6 (2)

By the way I have a deity whistle! How long ago was it since I got to gold?

Nov. 23, 2009 | 6:59 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All done. Funny that it's still there after 4 hours SHARP from when I responded this.

Congratulations! You have reached your target!

According to this:

http://supermariobross.newgrounds .com/news/post/326802#c2182734

...you have gotten the gold whistle at November 9, 2009 (which is 15 days; a little over 2 weeks).

Updated: Nov. 23, 2009, 7:01 PM

Nov. 23, 2009 | 3:30 PM TurtleKirby101 says:

Holy crap 175 comments already? I dought this post will reach the limit before it serverd it's purpose though.

Now, time for another round up.

How nice, the very first flash I click on is hentai crap, and has 2 reviews, both abusive.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518830

New-grounds-Oracle, 0

Oracun, 5

Wow, those reviews were only posted 5 mins ago and are being reported. Now THAT is effective.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518824

zapleaf, 1

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518780

Kregain, 1

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518764

MKira, 0

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518750

nicospl, 4

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518740/2/score

DETHman666, 0

YooCooper, 1

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518708

Mariomaster7

And that's were I hit last time.

Nov. 23, 2009 | 7:06 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - All done. I agree; that IS effective! However it's still there as I write this response.

2nd link - Done

3rd link - Done

4th link - Done

5th link - Done

6th link - Done

7th link - Done

Nice round-up; I must say.

Is it me, or has flagging become weaker? I mean, it's been 3.5 hours since you left this, and the reviews are STILL there! Normally they are supposed to be gone, but I don't know.

I think by the time Part 10 reaches 500 comments EVERYBODY will have a deity whistle. Maybe a few may not, but most of them should be close.


Nov. 23, 2009 | 3:37 PM TurtleKirby101 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/326664/49/score

I think there are quite a lot on the webcam games with people bitching. Check them out.

Nov. 23, 2009 | 7:09 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

You're right; there are A LOT of them! All of the 0-star reviews and 1-star reviews are within 2008-2009, so flag whatever you think are abusive in there.


Nov. 23, 2009 | 3:42 PM TurtleKirby101 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/324739/10/score

ESPECIALLY this one! I'm not even talking about people bitching anymore, I'm talking about people insulting the author, offering no constructive critisism, and not to mention being very stupid!

Nov. 23, 2009 | 7:13 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

You weren't kidding either...

Done. There are slightly more than in the previous link. Put those 2 together, and you have a bronze mine.


Nov. 23, 2009 | 5:32 PM Stretchysumo says:

http://ekim99.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash/1

This 10 year old has A LOT of abusive reviews.

Nov. 23, 2009 | 7:24 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Dude this idiot is like a huge target to troll with. Like say "Sonic sux" and he will be so furious by a troll saying "SONIC DOESN'T SUX!". And he thinks I'm being an asshole when I told him to not respond to trolls, and to grow the fuck up.

Example: http://shadic93.newgrounds.com/ne ws/post/397069

Anyway, all abusive reviews have been flagged.


Nov. 23, 2009 | 6:24 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518729
Sort by score; there's at least one abusive review on the last page.

Nov. 23, 2009 | 7:25 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done. It's the 0-star review, correct?


Nov. 23, 2009 | 6:28 PM Stickman91 says:

And regarding all that "secret" info, it really would be nice to have it all in one place. If it's already been publicly posted, it might as well be organized and located where everyone can easily find it.

Nov. 23, 2009 | 7:31 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

The thing is, moderators are NOT allowed to tell users that. The banning info, how much power they have, how they admin users on which rules they break are ALL stuff that should NOT be posted outside of the mod lounge. In fact, I'm probably NOT allowed to post that crap here. But SINCE it's a mod rule and I'm not a mod, I'm not going to be punished for that.

Some mods spilled that in several places. You will not easily find this information; you have to be fucking lucky like I was, determined, and willing to put a lot of hard and tedious work to gain all this. Even with all that, you won't find it easily. It's top secret (kind of).

It's a special gift that very few people get. Use it to your own advantage. It will remain in Part 10 at all times.

This is a very powerful weapon against mods who threaten you for incredible punishments they cannot actually administrate. So if a mod says "I will delete all your posts and ban you for 1 year", then you will know they are bluffing since they can't do all that (depending on the situation).

You're not going to find it in one place. NEVER. The mods are not allowed to do that. They can't, unless they want to be demodded. Pretty much only users can post that (one thing users can do that mods can't do). This is one place you know where information is all piled up together in a single place, so you can refer here for it if you want to. It will be here at all times, even when Part 10 is disabled. Not even most of the 2002 users know this stuff, so you may not have much luck finding another place that has all this information.

Updated: Nov. 23, 2009, 7:35 PM

Nov. 23, 2009 | 9:16 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/518851
ahhkira (0) Voxdeo (0)

Nov. 23, 2009 | 9:31 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All done.

I think there are more than that in there, but I'm not too sure...


Nov. 23, 2009 | 9:36 PM SuperMarioBrosS says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/510279

The one with the shit load of exclamation points (!). pedrorock7 I think is the reviewer.


Nov. 23, 2009 | 9:51 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/revie ws/182138
sonic1rocks2 (0) Teemu92 (0) larkendo (0) pseudohippie8 (0) SamWorld (0)
How easy is it to spot abusive reviews on stolen audio?
I feel lazy so I'm just going to give you this link
http://robbo5002.newgrounds.com/audio / (audio thief)

Nov. 25, 2009 | 8:07 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - All done

2nd link - All done.

We need to bring this guy to Wade's attention FAST...


Nov. 25, 2009 | 8:14 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Gone

2nd link - Most are gone. The remaining ones have been flagged.

3rd link - This flash has been BLAMMED by our users!

4th link - Gone, but there is 1 review in there that is abusive (3-starred)

5th link - There are PLENTY here!

6th link - None

7th link - Gone

8th link - Gone, but there's 1 in there...


Nov. 24, 2009 | 2:57 AM TurtleKirby101 says:

I'm going through the old part 2 goldmines and seeing if there's anything to salvage. Or better yet, goldmines that have massively built up and are ready for masssive clearing.

such as this: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /367537

Or these:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/368873/21/score

These are limited but contain a few:
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/202465/18/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/97211/11/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/85372/4/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/385350/3/score

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/59260/141/score - on that one, I see even though I posted it in part 2, some of my flags are still there, it's not enough to get them to a mod! They need more flags!

Well, that's all I got time for at the moment. I'll do some more later today.

Nov. 25, 2009 | 8:17 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Damn you; I was going to do that! This is a reason why I kept Part 2; to check back on goldmines.

I thought people here would never look back at Part 2, but it looks like someone cares about that post.

All done.


Nov. 24, 2009 | 1:19 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518787
Obvious abuse, just sort by score and look at the last pages. This one will probably "refill."

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /483830
Same deal, sort by score, etc.

All that information is quite useful, although I personally don't have the need to use it against threats from mods as I don't plan on getting banned anytime soon. In any case, it's nice to know how things work behind the scenes...

Nov. 25, 2009 | 8:58 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All reviews have been flagged.


Nov. 24, 2009 | 6:54 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518978
SledgeHammerGuy (0)

Nov. 25, 2009 | 8:59 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Gone.


Nov. 24, 2009 | 8:06 PM Stickman91 says:

http://turnable.newgrounds.com/review s/

One of the audio reviews complains about the song possibly being stolen.

Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:00 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Looks like it disappeared.

I don't see any.


Nov. 24, 2009 | 11:48 PM ihatesonic1 says:

http://rlc.newgrounds.com/reviews/fla sh
Here some

Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:00 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

There's still 1 left. Flagged.


Nov. 25, 2009 | 2:02 AM ihatesonic1 says:

http://hollyflippy88.newgrounds.com/a rt/

This guy steals, tell us what to write on each one!

Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:03 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

I see only one. Did I miss something?

On the field, just click the circular box next to the " This image is stolen from somewhere else. Please tell us where, if possible." option.

Then enter where it was stolen, by saying "This art was stolen from here: <link>".


Nov. 25, 2009 | 3:00 AM TurtleKirby101 says:

Time for a quick round up before I goota go to school.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /519019

anon181998, 0

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /519017

anon181998, 0 (Yep, same person)

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /519012

anon181998, 0 (Yep, same again. Looks like we got a spammer then)

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /519008

TheKrimsonKrusader, 0. No spammer here. he probably only just started spamming then.

Actually, checking the very new submissions, maybe he wasn't. Either way...

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /518989

allanime01, 0

Ok I gotta go now I'll finish off tonight

Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:06 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

1st link - Gone

2nd link - Gone

3rd link - Gone

4th link - Gone

5th link - Gone


Nov. 25, 2009 | 3:02 AM TurtleKirby101 says:

But look at the guy's profile, he has a lot of abusive reviews

http://anon181998.newgrounds.com/revi ews/flash

Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:06 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All gone.

You lucky bastards got all the whistle points!


Nov. 25, 2009 | 10:07 AM Stickman91 says:

http://kimmilohan.newgrounds.com/revi ews/

All the reviews advertise some website.

Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:08 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All gone too.


Nov. 25, 2009 | 10:24 AM TurtleKirby101 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/118987

Some here

Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:11 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Most are gone.

I flagged whatever I could get.


Nov. 25, 2009 | 10:28 AM TurtleKirby101 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/46851/1

A load here

Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:10 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Wow you weren't kidding...

All done. BTW, did I AGAIN forget to send you that PM?

Updated: Nov. 25, 2009, 9:11 PM

Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:13 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done. There are slightly more than that too.


Nov. 25, 2009 | 6:04 PM Stickman91 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /513800
IronGleet (0)
soniccat (1)
KhawnerL (0)
IrresistibleForce (0)
KuBiKRuBiK10 (0)
Qu1T (4)

Quick question: Why is it that you ask for the review scores next to the author names? Scores on abusive reviews can range from zero to ten, and if you know the author's name, you'll be able to see the score given in his/her review once you check out the submission in the link.

Just curious.

Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:18 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All done.

I ask for the review score since the review score numbers are way BIGGER than the user name text. It will make searching much easier. Like it would be easy to find the number "8" than the author's name "Stickman91" since the number sticks out more. And if there are more than 1 review with the score of "8", we can search only those reviews rather than the entire flood of reviews made.


Nov. 25, 2009 | 8:36 PM WeirdAlthe3rd says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /31162
Gino8 (0)

Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:19 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Done.


Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:31 PM Stickman91 says:

Ah, okay, good point. Anyway, back to business:
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /519096
Jayblazer9 (0)
JoeyBang16 (5)
MrScriblam (0)
TheHockerMan (10)
p00les (5)

Nov. 26, 2009 | 4:44 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All but the last one mentioned have disappeared. That last one has been flagged.


Nov. 25, 2009 | 9:45 PM jakenator85 says:

I ranked up! I'm now (finally) a Police Lieutenant!

Nov. 26, 2009 | 4:44 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Congratulations!

Although I'm still oddly higher in B/P status than you... and I'm not a statwhore...


Nov. 26, 2009 | 12:54 AM Stickman91 says:

http://linxman90.newgrounds.com/revie ws/
One abusive review...

Nov. 26, 2009 | 4:45 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Not any more.


Nov. 26, 2009 | 1:23 AM TurtleKirby101 says:

Yep, I think you forgot to send it again...

Nov. 26, 2009 | 4:45 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

I DEMAND a sent PM box NOW!

But really, I hate it when this happens.


Nov. 26, 2009 | 1:33 AM TurtleKirby101 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/31162/98/score

MASSIVE FANBOYISM ALERT!

and a bit of bitcing too...

Nov. 26, 2009 | 6:00 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Most of them are left in 2001...


Nov. 26, 2009 | 2:13 AM TurtleKirby101 says:

And we need more people to flag these, they are still there:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/46851/1

Nov. 26, 2009 | 6:01 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Because those reviews are made at 2004 at the earliest...?


Nov. 26, 2009 | 2:47 AM TurtleKirby101 says:

1 abusive audio review

http://anon181998.newgrounds.com/revi ews/

Nov. 26, 2009 | 6:03 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Gone


Nov. 26, 2009 | 3:03 AM TurtleKirby101 says:

I think it's about time we cheked over the art portal for reviews, they have probably built up while we have been concentrating on flash:

Hmm, no abusive reviews... they all seem to be 10s, 9s, 8s and 7s! And none are abusive!

Do you know what this means? Yes, indeed... part 10 has some competition. Some other thing must have cleared out the art portal. AND one time when I was doing a round up, I found that the first few submissions had already been cleared. So we got to watch out.

I'm very curious, so I'll check through the AP again.

Nov. 26, 2009 | 6:05 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Just because there is no flag doesn't mean that it has been cleared. It is because your browser was caching the page before the flag, and after coming back in a week the flag will not be there since it will load the cached version.

The Art Portal has a low amount of abusive reviews, but it is likely that any low-scored review is abusive, since most people can't criticize art properly.

Also, I think the flagging system is broken in the Art Portal. Like shit I have flagged in August still is there.


Nov. 26, 2009 | 8:59 AM tornadopilot2 says:

To turtlekirby that made the comment on Nov. 26, 2009 | 2:13 AM:
Why the reviews are still there: look at the dates they were made in. They were made in 2002-2004.

Nov. 26, 2009 | 6:06 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

That sums it up very well.


Nov. 26, 2009 | 6:25 PM ihatesonic1 says:

My whistle turned to Gold

Nov. 26, 2009 | 7:11 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Congratulations!

Are you going to stop, or go to deity?


Nov. 26, 2009 | 7:13 PM SuperMarioBrosS says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/519192

Soldiers; we have a possible future Turd of the Week!

On more serious notes, I suspect more will pop up. Until then, obvious abuse is obvious.


Nov. 26, 2009 | 9:47 PM tornadopilot2 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/revi ews/400192
azo111 (0) (keep an eye on him) JackWoods (3) chibimomo (1)

Nov. 26, 2009 | 11:48 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

I think there are more than that in there, but all done.


Nov. 26, 2009 | 10:07 PM danyrulex99 says:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view /519228
devilspal123(0)
Priks(0)
tntkid22(0)
KrugensKloset(1)

Nov. 26, 2009 | 11:48 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

All done.


Nov. 26, 2009 | 10:47 PM WeirdAlthe3rd says:

http://kindo45.newgrounds.com/reviews /
Yet again I found another fag spamming other peoples submissions.

Nov. 26, 2009 | 11:51 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

I think that account has been hacked, because it has pictures of penises plastered all over the place.

Err... NSFW by the way.

Updated: Nov. 26, 2009, 11:52 PM

Nov. 26, 2009 | 10:58 PM WeirdAlthe3rd says:

http://metaknightpwns2.newgrounds.com /reviews/
It's the same guy I mentioned in the link above me. Also he's starting to hack other peoples account, and keep an a lookout for the same exact Picture Icon, you'll know it's him.

P.S. I got a bronze whistle today and it's all thanks to you and the guys who post links to abusive reviews.

Nov. 26, 2009 | 11:54 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Also hacked, since there are penis pictures all over the place. Again NSFW.

I think the guy is back to spamming and hacking other people's accounts again. Either way, all reviews have been flagged. Where the fuck are the review mods when we need them?

Anyway, all done. Also, congratulations on the bronze whistle! Now your next level is silver!


Nov. 26, 2009 | 11:06 PM WeirdAlthe3rd says:

oh yeah, I forgot to mentioned this sooner in the 2 links I gave you flag all of his art because it contains hardcore adult porn. (Gay porn that is.)

Nov. 26, 2009 | 11:55 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Oh I see. But I was too late to flag it however.

Major props for reporting his art though!


Nov. 26, 2009 | 11:56 PM SuperMarioBrosS responds:

Someone has beaten you to it. But anyway, all done.

Is it me, or are we flagging ALMOST every single 0-star review?



Nov. 26, 2009 | 11:45 PM ihatesonic1 says:

Why should I stop now? I am too far ahead to quit, I am going all the way.
Also, haven't you ever notice that your whistle looks shiner when its close to leveling up than it does when you get it?

Jump to Entry: [ 11529 | 30 | 316011,171 ]